logologologologo
  • Home
  • Business
  • Markets
  • Exchange
  • Investment
  • Personal Finance

ESG funds are ‘definitely at a crossroads’: EY executive

When the United Nations (UN) first laid out principles for environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) investing in 2006, then-Secretary General Kofi Annan hailed the considerations as critical to underpinning “responsible investing” in the financial markets.

Amid growing scrutiny from conservative lawmakers and accusations of greenwashing at some of the world’s largest funds, these so-called green funds stand at a crossroads.

Sixteen years later, global assets held in ESG funds have ballooned to roughly $35 trillion, but now stand at a crossroads amid growing scrutiny from conservative lawmakers and accusations at some of the world’s largest funds.

“There’s nowhere near the level of influx we saw two or three years ago when ESG was really being touted as a kind of miracle cure,” told Steve Varley, EY global vice chair of sustainability. “You could do well financially, and it could do good in the world. I think we’re taking a pause in that definition now.”

In the U.S., in particular, the topic of ESG has become yet another polarizing topic, especially when compared to countries in Europe and the rest of the world.

“In the U.S., ESG has become far more politicized than I’ve seen it happen anywhere else in the business world,” Varley said. “We’re definitely at a crossroads for ESG. I don’t really know where it’s going to go in the next 12 months.”

‘A terrible teenager’

ESG funds have been shrouded in controversy over the last five years.

EY has doubled down on ESG in recent years, and as a company, reached a major milestone in fiscal 2021, becoming carbon negative globally and slashing its emissions by 56% from 2019 levels. That coincided with increasing scrutiny around green funds, accusation of false advertising, and skepticism around the stated impact of the funds’ claims.

This spring, German officials raided the offices of Deutsche Bank’s DWS unit over allegations the fund misled inventors by overstating the role ESG standards played in its investment decisions. That preceded an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into Goldman Sachs on whether some companies included in its ESG mutual funds ran counter to claims of “sustainability” laid out in marketing materials.

Back in May, the SEC fined BNY Mellon Investment Adviser $1.5 million for false claims that all assets included in its funds underwent an ESG quality review.

“What we have now is a three-letter acronym that’s 16 years old [and] I think we’d all agree is showing signs of being a terrible teenager,” Varley said. “It’s being misused in places and is also doing good in places.”

Political pushback

The SEC has proposed specific disclosure guidelines around ESG funds to “promote consistent, comparable, and reliable information for investors.”

The proposals include required disclosures of greenhouse gas emissions associated with portfolio investments who claim to consider environmental factors, and clear goals of specific impacts funds intend to achieve.

Those guidelines have been met with pushback. Republican lawmakers, particularly in red-leaning states, have accused the SEC of promoting “woke capitalism,” while BlackRock, the largest manager of ESG mutual funds raised concerns the agency’s requirements would “lead to the disclosure of proprietary information surrounding the fund’s ESG investment process over and above what funds are required to disclose for other principal investment strategies.”

While there are 600 sustainable funds and ETFs in the U.S., according to Morningstar, recent data points show questions around the transparency of ESG investing have added to waning interest in the practice. In May, investors pulled a record $2 billion from U.S. equity exchange-traded funds, according to Bloomberg Intelligence, ending three years of inflows.

Still, Varley maintained that ESG funds remain a “net good for business,” but does see a divide growing between the U.S. and Europe, with the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation requiring investors to qualify ESG funds in one of three categories. A recent analysis by Morningstar found that nearly a quarter of green funds did not qualify for the ESG designation based on the rules in place.

“We think that a lot of the measures [in the U.S.] will be toned down,” Varley said. “That’ll make a real big difference though to the EU, where the EU is still going really strong to regulate this whole area and really expect a lot more from companies in their reporting. For big global companies, that’s just going to make their life a lot harder as they have to now work in two different regimes.”

Related posts

March 24, 2023

TikTok CEO fails to convince Congress app is safe


Read more

Categories

  • Business
  • Content
  • Crypto
  • Exchange
  • Inflation
  • Investment
  • Markets
  • Personal Finance
  • Technology
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021

Recent Posts

  • TikTok CEO fails to convince Congress app is safe
  • Deutsche Bank and UBS shares hit as banking fears keep tight grip
  • SEC sues Tron founder Justin Sun, Lindsay Lohan, other celebrities over crypto sales
  • Employees are checked out at work more than at any time in history — and it makes no difference if they work from home or not. Here’s why
  • Rolls-Royce ‘Wraith Black Arrow’ marks end of V12 coupe era

About Us

The Alpha Cut a Vida Street LLC Company
1404 N. Ronald Reagan Blvd.
Suite 1120
Longwood, FL 32750

Link

(843) 256-4375
https://thealphacut.com

Why Us

Terms & Privacy
Policy & Procedure
Disclaimer

This material is not an offering, recommendation, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned or discussed, and is to be used for informational purposes only.
Any performance results discussed herein represent past performance, not a guarantee of future performance, and are not indicative of any specific investment. Due to the timing of information presented, investment performance may be adjusted after the publication of this report. There can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this communication will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance levels or be suitable for your portfolio.
All data in this communication is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended for trading or investing purposes. We expressly disclaim the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any data and content provided by financial exchanges, individual issuers, their respective affiliates and business partners and shall not be liable for any errors, omissions or other defects in, delays or interruptions in such data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. You agree not to copy, modify, reformat, download, store, reproduce, reprocess, transmit or redistribute any data or information found herein or use any such data or information in a commercial enterprise without obtaining our prior written consent.
We make no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any data contained herein. The data may not be further redistributed or used to create indices or other financial products. This report and the views expressed herein are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions (such as domestic and global economic trends) and are current as of the date of publication hereof. The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or entity.
We emphasize that Investment in the securities of smaller companies can involve greater risk than is generally associated with investment in larger, more established companies, and can result in significant capital losses that may have a detrimental effect on the value of your investments.
Forecasting represents predictions of market prices and/or volume patterns utilizing varying analytical data. It is not representative of a projection of the stock market, or of any specific investment.
Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment. The general information contained in this publication should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax and investment advice from a licensed professional.
Please remember that all investments carry some level of risk, including the potential loss of principal invested. They do not typically grow at an even rate of return and may experience negative growth.As with any structuring of a portfolio of investments, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns.
The information, analysis and opinions expressed herein are for general, impersonal information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual entity.

copyright © Alpha Cut 2021. All Right Reserved
The Alpha Cut a Vida Street LLC Company